Climate Legislation Made Easy

Democrats in Congress released their most recent climate change bill yesterday.

The so-called Waxman-Markey discussion draft attempts to satisfy all constituencies:

The US Climate Partnership -- the powerful coalition of utilities, car makers, manufacturers and environmental organizations -- got its vision of a cap-and-trade scheme adopted. That means the environmentalists are pleased with strong GHG emission reduction targets (80 percent below 2005 levels by 2050). Meanwhile, heavy industrials (iron and steel, aluminum, cement, glass, chemicals and paper) will benefit from a 15 percent reserve of the system's emission allowances -- a structure designed to keep down allowance prices (and thus the cost of compliance) for businesses most vulnerable to international competition. 

The renewable industry got a renewable portfolio standard, which would force utilities to provide at least 25 percent of their energy from renewable sources
 by 2025. The coal industry also came out with $10 billion to fund carbon capture and sequestration research. (That's on top of the billions already provided under the recently enacted stimulus plan.)


As critics have already noted, the bill fails to take on the make-or-break issues. For starters, it skips the thorny question of how to distribute allowances. The Obama administration wants to auction all of the pollution allowances while businesses are pushing to distribute some allowances for free.

Avoiding that issue allowed the bill to avoid another tricky one: where should any auction money go. 

Critics will see these omissions as a fatal flaw -- akin to introducing a carbon tax proposal without a specific tax percentage. 

I see this as a master stroke. The best chance for passing a cap-and-trade bill is to get the key adversaries -- environmentalists, vulnerable industries and coal -- to the negotiating table. Or at least to agree on the shape of that table. Then they can have a debate about these key issues out in the open.

Waxman and Markey have done just that. And set the stage to actually pass ambitious climate legislation this year.

Trackbacks (1) Links to blogs that reference this article Trackback URL
http://www.climatechangeinsights.com/admin/trackback/122283
Climate Change Insights - May 8, 2009 12:28 PM
Here in Washington, every day brings a new rumor about the fate of the attempt to pass comprehensive climate change legislation this year. Today, the same day The New York Times ran an editorial supporting quick action on climate change,...
Comments (0) Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end
Post A Comment / Question Use this form to add a comment to this entry.







Remember personal info?
Send To A Friend Use this form to send this entry to a friend via email.